Sunday, February 15, 2015

Open Prompt Part Two: 2003

2003 Prompt: According to critic Northrop Frye, “Tragic heroes are so much the highest points in their human landscape that they seem the inevitable conductors of the power about them, great trees more likely to be struck by lightning than a clump of grass. Conductors may of course be instruments as well as victims of the divisive lightning.” Select a novel or play in which a tragic figure functions as an instrument of the suffering of others. Then write an essay in which you explain how the suffering brought upon others by that figure contributes to the tragic vision of the work as a whole.
*   *   *

     Tragic figures in literature often serve a purpose as conductors of lighting, causing destruction and pain onto the lives around them. In William Shakespeare's Hamlet, the protagonist, Hamlet, is at an established and high-ranking spot of society. In this analogy, the ghost of the late King Hamlet is the lighting, that abruptly electrifies Elsinore with revenge and deception. With this power and prestige, Hamlet metaphorically acts as a lighting rod to the purge of Elsinore and his own self-destruction.

     At the beginning of the play, Hamlet is confronted by his father's ghost and given the mission of avenging his death. This is destructive to Hamlet's physiological well being because the task at hand conflicts with his moral foundation. The idea of Providence, where there is no free will other than through God's path, would instruct Hamlet to ignore his father's requests and forgive Claudius for the murder. This conflict between the requests of two majorly influential "father figures" (God and the late King Hamlet) causes the actual action toward killing Claudius to be delayed, allowing other events to ensue. The longer it takes for Hamlet to realize the correct path to take, the drama builds up, resulting in complete and udder disaster in the end, including his own demise. This ties into the meaning of the play because during the period of Hamlet's moral contemplation he is given power and is separated from his peers, like a lighting rod would be placed in solitude, he is struck with the ultimate punishment: death.

     On the other hand, Hamlet's influence on the events within the walls of Elsinore are also destructive to everyone around him. During this contemplation, his actions indirectly lead to the death of two people in Elsinore. Polonius is killed while hiding behind an arras, where he was eavesdropping on Hamlet and Gertrude's conversation. Polonius never would have been hiding there if Hamlet was not so misleading with his "pretend madness" and odd behavior prior to the event, which was a result to the initial request of his father. Hamlet is also indirectly responsible for Ophelia's death because after the contact with his father, he began to loose trust in everyone around him, including his love, Ophelia. In giving her the cold shoulder and murdering her father, she was driven to insanity and took her own life. All in all, Hamlet acts as the center of attention throughout the play, and all the events that are weighted with death surround his actions. Claudius and Polonius's conspiracy, Laertes's revenge, Ophelia's suicide, Gertrude's poisoning, and the murder of Hamlet himself all are a result of Hamlet's contact with the King's specter.

     The young prince Hamlet is victim as well as instrument of the Ghost's lightning, which leads to the purge of everyone at the end of the play. As seeking revenge for his father's death, Hamlet defies the laws of Providence, spreading what once was a lighting bolt of electricity into a relentless display of fire.

4 comments:

  1. Hey Abby,

    This essay was great! I really liked the structure of the essay. The thesis paragraph was superb, with a concise thesis statement. Your supporting paragraphs were great, but I would add one more. You should go for the three like in Nuts and Bolts of College Writing. The conclusion was great as well. Other than that, there is not much I can say. You did well.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Abby,
    I think you did a really good job with this essay. Although I agree with Nick that you should add one more paragraph to help support your thesis. One little thing that really bothered me was your use of the word physiological in the first paragraph. I think you meant to say psychological, physiological refers more to body functions then just the mind. I also don't really like how you said that providence there is no free will besides Gods path. I thought that providence is Gods master plan and we have the free will of whether or not to follow his will. Overall I agreed with your ideas though and thought you did a very nice job.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Melissa,
      Oh yeah I did use the wrong word in my first paragraph! Thanks for pointing that out for me! I hate it when I make little mistakes like that lol.
      And about the free will thing, I was trying to touch on the presentation of free will in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Providence or God lets us walk around on the ship of free will and life, doing as we please and under the impression that we have free will. But in the end we still end up at the same port, with the same events taking place upon our arrival (death). Sure, we can jump off the ship, but that's pretty much the only thing we can do to counter Providence, which, if you think about it, ends the same anyway because you still die. The only way to truly escape God's path is to never die, never reach oblivion.

      Delete
  3. Sup.
    Look I'm not one to read into this kind of thing but it's like you get it. I mean these ideas are like uncomfortably similar to mine like I mean are you single? Yikes. Off to a weird start. Well ok, let's get weird.
    Jk there's really nothing weird here um I think you did a nice job. Like Nick said, solid thesis and decent support. Where do these thoughts come from like do you always write like this? I'm impressed by your coherence. It's an ace, Ace. Good work. Interesting thoughts on Providence.

    ReplyDelete