Saturday, October 11, 2014

Close Reading Response to: It's Decorative Gourd Season, Motherfuckers.

     Satiric works of the twenty-first century commonly use offensive and provocative content to assist the development of their central ideas and purpose. Although considered unsophisticated and vulgar, the use of this content is extremely effective when pointing out societal flaws to the public eye. Common examples of this can be found in the popular late-night program, Saturday Night Live, where absurd skits are used to portray American tendencies that are commonly criticized. In the article, "It's Decorative Gourd Season, Motherfuckers.", Colin Nissan uses bold diction, details, and language to express his strong negative opinion toward seasonal enthusiasts in an offensive, but effective way.


     The use of words such as "fuck" and "asshole" bring across an urgent and excited atmosphere, thus making the author's sarcasm more obvious to the reader. Normally, when wording like this is used, it is in context of extreme emotion and situation. However, in the article, the narrator is simply decorating his dining room table, and because this is not normally an emotion evoking task, the contrast forces the reader to look fro deeper meaning. "Guess what season it is--- fucking fall. There's a nip in the air and my house is full of mutant fucking squash." Nissan uses diction, in the form of excessive cursing, to stress how obnoxious enthusiasm towards Fall is as unnecessary as his extreme and absurd language.

     Two details are provided to indirectly characterize the narrator and help the reader compare his sanity from a literal and figurative basis. Nissan talks about "Performing an all-gourd reenactment of an episode of Diff'rent Strokes--- specifically the one ... with sexual molestation" along with the act of knocking his guests out with "zucchini-descendant bastards" and exerting a loud, stereo-typically Italian, laugh when it happens. Now, if the reader takes all of this in literally, he would come to the conclusion that the narrator is incredibly creepy and pleasures from acts of sexual molestation and assault. However, with this literal interpretation, the meaning is lost and the monologue has no purpose. If the reader successfully recognizes the sarcasm in the piece, he would also recognize that, in fact, the narrator is not insane, but is mocking the creepy, obsessive, and socially awkward people that he associates with Fall activities. Nissan probably also has the same attitude toward people who dress up as vampires and patiently wait at their front doors for children to ask for candy.

     It can also be found that the entire article is a huge hyperbole. The narrator takes part in various activities that are not only extremely uncommon, but also exaggerating in nature. For example, in the fourth paragraph he declares that he is going to "carve one of the longer gourds into a perfect replica of the Mayflower as a shout-out to [his] Pilgrim forefathers." Then goes on the say, "Then I'm going to do lines of blow off its hull with a hooker." Later in the piece, he declares his participation in an activity of equal extreme, "For now, all I plan to do is to throw on a flannel shirt, some tattered overalls, and a floppy fucking hat and stand in the middle of the cornfield for a few days. The first crow that tries to land on me is going to get his avian ass bitch-slapped all the way back to summer." Of course, doing any of these things is incredibly uncommon, and the reader can assume that he does not actually take part in any of them. The hyperbole of the narrator's enthusiasm enforces the notion towards sarcasm in the piece, and poses as mockery of the people who actively take part in Fall festivities, which in actuality are less dramatic than previously mentioned, but nevertheless annoying.

     It is clear that Nissan uses aggressive diction, alluding details, and figurative language in his article to portray his emotions towards the ever-so-excessive expression of autumn ecstasy. The profanities found in the piece certainly jump off the page and leave little room for alternative interpretation. However, there is likely a select group of people who simply believe that Colin Nissan is just a very expressive psychopath.

To access the article, CLICK HERE

7 comments:

  1. Hey Abby!

    I can honestly say that I am very impressed by your close reading. I felt that the most eye-opening part was your section on figurative language. I had never thought to characterize an entire piece as one giant hyperbole, but now that you mention it, that’s what this really is.

    I would hope that anyone reading this piece would immediately realize it’s satire; if not, I’m a bit concerned. As you say in your close reading, the author clearly uses DIDLS to emphasize his point and bring meaning to the piece.

    Do you think that Nissan actually feels this passionately about hating fall enthusiasts? I personally feel that, while it’s true people who get excited about gourds can be annoying, Nissan is not actually that upset. I feel that this is more of a comedic piece, using strong language to make people laugh at how absurd obnoxious enthusiasm is, or maybe even laugh in self-defense.

    You mention SNL commonly uses provocative content; I’m about to watch the newest Halloween episode of Saturday Night Live. They’re sure to weigh in on fall enthusiasts – perhaps they’ll even agree with Nissan.

    Thanks for a great blog post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Morgan,

      Thank you for your comment! No, I don't think that Nissan actually holds a hated for Fall enthusiasts, the muse for his article was probably similar to those who consistently criticize the festive obligation of a Pumpkin Spiced Latte; His discontent is most likely non-violent in nature. I also agree that the piece is more of a comedy than an exposé. :):)

      Delete
  2. Greetings broseph,

    So I really liked the article and was pretty surprised you picked it. I guess a school blog isn't where I expected to see this kind of stuff (for whatever reason).

    I didn't get what you got from the analysis though. I felt like Nissan was simply trying to make a funny article with hyperbole and exaggeration. I didn't sense any commentary on Fall enthusiasts or creepy people. Often people will use curses and extreme situations like that because its very funny (I know I do) so I just saw a little of the humor I like in the article and that's probably why I saw what I saw instead of what you saw.

    Your categories were strong though. I feel like they should have all went to proving how his extreme language created a funny effect, but your evidence works well for both.

    Why did you see a commentary on Fall enthusiasts though?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ahmad,

      I was pretty unsure about using this article due to all of the profane language, but I justified it because after all, this is a college class and my blog is only slightly affiliated with the school.

      I think that every form of satire and mockery, no matter how terrible, has a subject that is being criticized. Even is a simple joke, such as a "dumb blonde joke", has a purpose to comment on an aspect of society that the joker is unsatisfied with. Because Nissan was using sarcasm to characterize himself in various roles of types of people who actively take part in Fall festivities, I concluded that he was trying to create a comment on their behavior. I doubt that Nissan meant the article to be any sort of social reform, its purpose is just to make some people laugh. However, in order to successfully analyze the article, I wanted to have a clear understanding of the subject of Nissan's criticism, just as you would on a political piece from FOX News.

      Delete
  3. Hey Abby,

    I like this post a lot. I think it was very bold of you to pick such a post, but I also think you found an easy loophole in the system. Profanity is so taboo in academic environments that it has become a gold mine for literary analysis. I commend you for taking this path!

    As easy as you may have found an article, you certainly did a good job analyzing it. I only have one question though: most people find an article for this assignment, but I feel that this assignment found your article. I guess what I'm trying to ask is whether or not you already knew of these satirical piece before you got this assignment?

    I really wish I could offer some constructive criticism, but you did a better job on this than I ever would. So I won't give half-hearted advice, you can get off with a 'good job'!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Matt,

      Thank you for your comment!

      No I did not already know of this article before the assignment! I was just browsing McSweeny's and found it! Although I may have been in search of something slightly more unique than the last article I did a close read on. :)

      Delete
  4. Abby--You've done excellent work on this blog, and I see progress already from September to October! I really like that you take the time to respond to your peer reviewers, too. I remember us talking about this particular article, and I did check out your blog after you said you thought I'd like it--I was so happy to see you'd found this piece! It's one of my all-time favorite McSweeny's pieces, so clearly, great minds DO think alike. =)

    ReplyDelete